Allgood v. State

Appellant was tried on an information charging him with the crime of assault with intent to kill Jim Allgood, and was convicted of aggravated assault; and brings this appeal, claiming as error the three points hereinafter discussed:

I. The Insufficiency of the Evidence. In testing the legal sufficiency of evidence to support a verdict it must be viewed on appeal in the light most favorable to the appellee. Thomas and Carter v. State, 196 Ark. 123, 116 S. W. 2d 358; Crosby v. State, 169 Ark. 1058, 277 S. W. 523; Canada v. State, 169 Ark. 221, 275 S. W. 327. With the above rule in mind we reach…