Pollock v. Pegues
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Chesterfield, January, 1905. Action by Carrie E. Pollock, W. P. Pollock, M. H. Stacey and E. E. Stacey against James W. Pegues.
Read the full summary
Before Aldrich, J., Chesterfield, January, 1905. Action by Carrie E. Pollock, W. P. Pollock, M. H. Stacey and E. E. Stacey against James W. Pegues. The cause was referred to R. T. Caston, who made the following report: “It appears that the plaintiff, W. P. Pollock, acting as ag-ent and attorney in fact for the plaintiff, Carrie E. Pollock, who is his sister, and by whom he was given such authority, had in his charge 400 acres of land, fully described in complaint, which was owned by her. “In the early part of year 1902 he made for her a contract and agreement with the defendant, James W.…
1Opinion of the Court
June 30, 1905. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from a decree of his Honor, Judge James Aldrich. In order to understand the issues here involved, the pleadings will be reproduced, and are as follows:
"The complaint of the plaintiffs shows:
"1. That in the year A.D. 1901, the plaintiff, Carrie E. Pollock, was lawfully seized and possessed of all that certain piece, parcel or tract of land, in Chesterfield County, S.C. containing 400 acres, more or less, bounded * * * the said land having been sold under foreclosure or mortgage, held by the said Carrie E. Pollock, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. BookmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Gaston v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
- Moore v. TrimmierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
- Bethune v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Shuford v. ShinglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Fidelity-Bankers' Trust Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Williams v. BrutonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922