Legal Opinion

Soule v. Veyrac

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 3, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Luman A. Soule against Victor L. Veyrac. From a judgment of the city court (31 N. Y. Supp. 1133) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought to recoyer the sum of $450, claimed by respondent to be owing him under an alleged contract as altered and changed by consent of the parties thereto. Although there is a statement in the case, there is no certificate to the effect that all of the evidence given upon the trial is included in the case. No motion was made for the dismissal of the complaint or the direction of a verdict by the defendant at any time during the progress of the trial. Therefore, the judgment of affirmance by the general term of the city court is conclusive upon us, both as to the weight of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Arnstein v. HaulenbeekNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  3. Atkins v. . ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. People of the State of New York v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Wilmore v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Halwig, New York County Courts1903
  2. Jennings v. KosmakAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API