Legal Opinion

Barber v. Gross

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1952No. File 9242Published

1Opinion of the Court

51 N.W.2d 696 (1952)

BARBER

v.

GROSS.

No. 9242.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

February 4, 1952.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1952.

Fosheim & Blue, Huron, for defendant and appellant.

Temmey & Luby, Huron, for plaintiff and respondent.

LEEDOM, Judge.

Plaintiff, the respondent here, brought this action to recover on a $1,000 promissory note given him by defendant as part payment on the price of a spraying machine used for spraying or dipping livestock. In his answer defendant, who brought this appeal', alleged that he was only 18 years old at the time of making the note and that he had "disaffirmed" the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Leonard v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Murdock v. Fisher Finance CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Lebaron v. Berryessa Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Shutter v. FudgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API