Barnett v. Mutual Insurance

Pinola, J.,

Plaintiffs ask for a new trial in an action on a fire insurance policy in which the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.

The reasons assigned are as follows:

“1. The verdict as directed by the learned Trial Judge was against the evidence.

“2. The verdict as directed by the learned Trial Judge was against the weight of the evidence.

“3. The verdict as directed by the learned Trial Judge was against the law.

*638“4. The learned Trial Judge erred in refusing to affirm the plaintiffs points for binding instructions in its charge to the jury.”

In their complaint, plaintiffs averred that…