Saylor v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Darrell Saylor, defendant, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief contending *350his guilty plea should be set aside due to the trial court’s failure to comply with Indiana Rules of Procedure, Criminal Rule 10 and to fully advise defendant of his constitutional rights before accepting his plea.
We affirm.
Saylor argues his arraignment record does not comply with CR. 10 and is therefore fatally defective. The record is a pre-printed questionnaire with defendant’s responses hand-written in beneath each interrogatory. Using a pre-printed questionnaire to record an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McFarland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Barron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tibbs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Janigon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Melendez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Laird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979