United States v. Studio Club
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtThacher, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
There can be no doubt that the statute is to be construed as authorizing the exercise of power, conferred by statute or inherently possessed, solely for the purpose of abating an existing nuisance. U. S. v. Chesebrough Manufacturing Co., 11 F.(2d) 537. The decree is always to be addressed to the rights existing, not at the moment of suit begun, but at the time of its determination. U. S. v. Gaffney et al., 10 F. (2d) 694. If, therefore, the nuisance has ceased to exist, in the sense that there is no reasonable likelihood of its recurrence, dismissal of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BoyntonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
- United States v. SchwartzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
- United States v. Chesebrough Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- United States v. MargolisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. General Amusement Co. of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1927
- Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- United States v. Butler Hotel Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1929