Legal Opinion
Palmieri v. Ringling Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated March 6, 1996, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because issues of fact exist as to whether the defendants breached their duty to take adequate crowd control measures to protect patrons exiting Madison Square Garden after a circus performance.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Palermo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Benanti v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hsieh v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sawyer v. WightDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Gordon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Madden v. Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Greenberg v. Sterling Doubleday Enterprises, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ganapolsky v. Barnes & NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.