Legal Opinion

Lowenstein v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Foreclosure of laborer’s lien. Before Judge Bennet. Glynn superior court. February 2, 1901. cited, on the proposition that the plaintiff below was not entitled to a laborer’s lien: 63 Ga. 172; 68 Ga. 659; 73 Ga. 234; 98 Ga. 249 ; 99 Ga. 250; 108 Ga. 411; Id. 794; 110 Ga. 326. On the proposition that the defendant’s undertaking to pay the debt was not valid: Civil Code, §§ 2474, 2488, 5790 ; 80 Ga. 620 ; 92 Ga. 327; 96 Ga. 684; Id. 566; 98 Ga. 428 ; Id. 43 (3); Id. 667; 103…

Read the full summary

Foreclosure of laborer’s lien. Before Judge Bennet. Glynn superior court. February 2, 1901. cited, on the proposition that the plaintiff below was not entitled to a laborer’s lien: 63 Ga. 172; 68 Ga. 659; 73 Ga. 234; 98 Ga. 249 ; 99 Ga. 250; 108 Ga. 411; Id. 794; 110 Ga. 326. On the proposition that the defendant’s undertaking to pay the debt was not valid: Civil Code, §§ 2474, 2488, 5790 ; 80 Ga. 620 ; 92 Ga. 327; 96 Ga. 684; Id. 566; 98 Ga. 428 ; Id. 43 (3); Id. 667; 103 Ga. 745; 106 Ga. 238; 107 Ga. 804; 110 Ga. 376 ; 112 Ga. 330.' cited, as to right to laborer’s lien: Civil Code, §§ 2792,…

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Meyer brought suit in Glynn superior court against Mrs. Yiola Lowenstein, to foreclose a laborer’s lien for work done by the plaintiff while in the employment of the defendant as a bartender. The defendant filed a counter affidavit, and the issue thus formed was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount sued for. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and she excepted.

1. It appeared from the evidence that the duties of the plaintiff required him to attend the bar, wash bottles, sweep out the barroom, unpack goods, keep…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Daniel v. RoyceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Oliver v. Boehm, Bendheim & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vizard v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Atlanta Suburban Land Corp. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Sims v. ScheusslerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Anderson v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API