Legal Opinion

State v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. C87-11-36590; CA A49640PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant was convicted for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s order of restitution. We remand for resentencing.

Defendant pleaded no contest and was placed on probation for five years. At the sentencing and restitution hearings, he presented evidence about his financial situation, employment and debts. The Presentence Investigation Report recommended, among other things, that defendant pay restitution to the owner of the house in which the drug was manufactured1 and that he also pay a $1,000 fine.

Defendant’s counsel requested that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DikemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API