United States of America, Makah Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant v. State of Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The Makah Tribe sought a determination of its usual and accustomed fishing places under an 1855 treaty. It argues that the district court applied a too stringent standard of proof and improperly substituted its judgment for that of the Special Master. We affirm.
The Makahs are primarily an ocean fishing tribe that has traditionally depended on its ocean catch for both sustenance and trade. See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 363 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976) (the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Washington v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, Tulalip Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Suquamish Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.