Legal Opinion

Layne v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1932No. Docket No. 8387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This isan original proceeding in mandadmus asking that the trial court be directed to grant petitioner's motion to offset his judgment against a judgment for the defendant in an action entitled Layne v. Kirby.

In the action referred to petitioner as plaintiff commenced an action for libel in which the demurrer of .defendant Kirby was sustained. Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, which reversed the .judgment and awarded plaintiff costs amounting to $325. The remittitur duly followed and, no motion to tax costs having been made, judgment was duly entered in favor of plaintiff in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nash v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Airfloor Co. of California v. Regents of UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API