Legal Opinion

Nash v. Kreling

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1902No. S.F. No. 2119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to recall execution issued by plaintiff.

The ease is as follows: In two suits brought by the plaintiff against the defendant in the court below, judgment was. entered in the one for the plaintiff, for the sum of $307.75,. and in the other, for the defendant, for the sum of $134.75 and, on appeal, both judgments were affirmed by this court February 13, 1899. Notice of motion to offset the defendant’s judgment was served on plaintiff’s attorney February 23d, and came on for hearing March 18th, of the same year; but by reason of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Black v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California Cotton Credit Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Layne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API