Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Wilkinson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1904No. 4,741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; John M. Smith, Judge. Action by Fred H. Wilkinson against Samuel E. Wilkinson. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

The assignment of error upon which this appeal is prosecuted is the single specification that the trial court erred in its first conclusion of law. The first conclusion of law was as follow's: “That as to the item of $492.95, and the interest thereon, the same is barred by the statute of limitations of six years.” The exception to the conclusion of law admits that the facts upon which it was stated were correctly found.

The facts so found, in so far as they are applicable to the question here presented, were substantially as follows: On the 30th day of March, 1875, William H. Wilkinson, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Davidson v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wright v. KleylaIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. King v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fourthman v. FourthmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norris, by Next Friend v. MingleIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API