Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schuler
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Superior Court of Madison County; H. Clarence Austill, Judge. Action by George E. Schuler against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Bailway Company Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSpences, J.
Appellee instituted this action to recover for services rendered to appellant by appellee and to recover the amount of a penalty alleged to be due under the provisions of §2683c Burns 1914, Acts 1911 p. 446, which reads as follows: “Any railroad company employing men shall within seventy-two hours after any employe voluntarily quits such service or is discharged, pay to such employe in full the wages due to the time of quitting of such service: Provided, Demand is made therefor and upon failure so to do, such railroad company shall be liable to such employe for each day until such payment is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SimonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- School City of Rushville v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Seelyville Coal & Mining Co. v. McGlossonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Davis Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Evansville & Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. Southern Indiana Rural Electric Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Davidow v. Wadsworth Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.