Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schuler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1914No. 22,351PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Madison County; H. Clarence Austill, Judge. Action by George E. Schuler against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Bailway Company Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpences, J.

Appellee instituted this action to recover for services rendered to appellant by appellee and to recover the amount of a penalty alleged to be due under the provisions of §2683c Burns 1914, Acts 1911 p. 446, which reads as follows: “Any railroad company employing men shall within seventy-two hours after any employe voluntarily quits such service or is discharged, pay to such employe in full the wages due to the time of quitting of such service: Provided, Demand is made therefor and upon failure so to do, such railroad company shall be liable to such employe for each day until such payment is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SimonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. School City of Rushville v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Seelyville Coal & Mining Co. v. McGlossonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Davis Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Evansville & Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. Southern Indiana Rural Electric Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Davidow v. Wadsworth Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API