Legal Opinion

Bodrick v. Mayfair Construction Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed and the certified question answered in the negative.

The regulations of subtitle A of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted by the United States Secretary of Labor and existing during the period in question, evidenced a design and charting of course for the conduct of investigations and hearings in prevailing wage disputes only as the secretary, in his discretion, deemed appropriate or desirable (see, e.g., 29 CFR 5.10). There being no exclusive administrative remedy prescribed therein, the aggrieved employees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Filardo v. Foley Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. NAP Constr. Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Bosh v. FaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Bamond v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API