Jourdan v. Dean
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 361, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, and No. 367, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Payette Co., September Term, 1894, No. 654, for defendants non obstante veredicto. Ejectment for a tract of land in South Union township.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 361, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, and No. 367, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Payette Co., September Term, 1894, No. 654, for defendants non obstante veredicto. Ejectment for a tract of land in South Union township. Before Barker, P. J., of the 47th judicial district, specially presiding: See Miller v. Thompson, infra, p. 618. The facts appear by the following, opinion of the court: The case first stated above (the case in hand) was tried before a jury October 2, 1895, and there being no material questions of fact in dispute, the jury was directed to render a verdict in…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
in No. 361,
■There was no controversy as to the - controlling facts in this case.-' -They are substantially the same as those embodied in the *617case stated that was heard and disposed of in the court below at the same time, — so far, at least, as the questions of law involved are concerned. Both cases were also argued together here.
In his opinion, disposing of the questions of law involved in both cases, and directing judgment for the defendants in this ease, non obstante veredicto, the learned president of the forty-seventh judicial district, who specially presided at the trial,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Simon's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- BOSSES v. MAHALSKYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Haines TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hanley v. RichardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.