State v. Maurisky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The accused was brought to trial upon a criminal information containing two counts, the first of which charged that he “did sell and did keep with intent to sell and exchange” certain spirituous and intoxicating liquors, without a United States govern ment permit, and the second, that he “did keep a certain bar or establishment which was and was reputed to be a place where spirituous and intoxicating liquors were kept for sale or exchange contrary to law.” His counsel press upon our attention four errors which he claims to have been committed at the trial, of which three grow out of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Banks v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beckanstin v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- State v. CriscuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- State v. LamperelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954