Legal Opinion
Marriage of Nasca v. PeopleSoft
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 23, 1999No. C 97-4639 VRWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
This action originated in 1994, when plaintiff Peter Nasca filed for the dissolution of his marriage to plaintiff Denise Nasca in Contra Costa Superior Court. California Family Code § 2337(c)(6)(A) requires that a party’s retirement or pension plan be joined as a party to a divorce proceeding. On December 10, 1997, plaintiffs joined Peter Nasca’s employer, PeopleSoft, as a party pursuant to section 2337. PeopleSoft manages Mr. Nasca’s retirement plan, which is regulated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”).
On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Barbara J Magrath v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019