Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1996No. CR-94-2080PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, John E. Pritchett, appeals from the trial court's summary denial of his petitions for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., in which he attacked his guilty plea convictions for theft by fraudulent leasing and escape in the second degree.1 The appellant did not file a direct appeal from either conviction.

In his petition attacking his conviction for theft by fraudulent leasing, the appellant alleged the following as grounds for relief: (1) that because he "lacked the specific criminal intent" required to be guilty of theft, he was "indicted under an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Sheats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Durr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API