Legal Opinion

C. Maxwell Brown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 12, 1955No. 11980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Chief Judge.

From our decision, 209 F.2d 260, affirming his conviction for wilfully at-temping to defeat and evade income taxes for 1946 and 1947, the appellant sought certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States and the writ issued. In a series of cases wherein the “net worth” method of proof was followed by conviction, the Supreme Court undertook a general consideration of this technique, noted its widespread use, and, while upholding its admissibility as circumstantial evidence, cautioned a close scrutiny of its use because fraught with danger to the innocent.

The cases…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. CulverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  4. United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API