C. Maxwell Brown v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Chief Judge.
From our decision, 209 F.2d 260, affirming his conviction for wilfully at-temping to defeat and evade income taxes for 1946 and 1947, the appellant sought certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States and the writ issued. In a series of cases wherein the “net worth” method of proof was followed by conviction, the Supreme Court undertook a general consideration of this technique, noted its widespread use, and, while upholding its admissibility as circumstantial evidence, cautioned a close scrutiny of its use because fraught with danger to the innocent.
The cases…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. CulverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970