Legal Opinion
Akers v. City of Oak Grove
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 18, 2008No. SC 88581PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. Introduction
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
The City of Oak Grove appeals the availability and method of calculation of prejudgment interest on a temporary partial taking inverse condemnation. Although prejudgment interest is available in these cases, it was improperly calculated in this instance. The judgment is therefore reversed and remanded as to the calculation of prejudgment interest. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
II.Facts
The City of Oak Grove has recently experienced serious problems with its sewer system. Randolph and Kelly Akers, owners of several apartment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Laughlin v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Schweich v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Carpenter v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys v. Barton CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- City of St. Joseph v. Lake Contrary Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.