Kroger Co. v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentDuncan, J.
I am constrained to dissent. The constitutional prohibition against lotteries, Section 6, Article XY of the Constitution of Ohio, has been implemented by the General Assembly in the enactment of R. C. Chapter 2915. In my view, Regulation 53, Section II of the Liquor Control Commission, had its ori*176gin in R. C. Chapter 2915, and, as such, is penal in nature, which demands a strict construction delimited by the purpose for its existence. After touching base with this guideline of criminal statutory construction, I agree, as does the majority, that the essential proof requirements of gambling,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- California Gasoline Retailers v. Regal Petroleum Corp. of Fresno, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
- The People v. Eagle Food Centers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- CUDD v. AschenbrennerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.