Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
“The first task facing a contestant seeking to enforce rights allegedly acquired in a prize-winning contest, in a court of law or equity, is that of showing that the contest scheme was legal, for courts uniformly refuse to lend their aid in the enforcement of an illegal agreement.” Annot., Private Rights and Remedies Growing Out of Prize-Winning Contests, 87 ALR2d 649, 662, § 2 (1963). Our courts have uniformly refused to lend their aid in either law or equity to enforce contracts between promoters and participants, or to settle disputes between competing participants, where…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Phalen v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Meyer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Jenner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- CONTACT, INC. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Talley v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Tierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.