Legal Opinion

Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1992No. 90-3553PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In Frey v. Amoco Production Co., 943 F.2d 578 (5th Cir.1991) we decided, inter alia, that when a Louisiana mineral lease provides the lessor “royalty on gas sold by the Lessee of one-fifth (Vs) of the amount realized at the well from such sales,” take- or-pay payments, received by the lessee from a pipeline-purchaser for gas not taken, are subject to the lessor’s royalty. Id. at 580-86. Our decision states the meaning of this suit’s royalty clause as a matter of Louisiana law. While we continue to believe in the propriety of our rationale and its consequence, Amoco convinces us in its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Robin Free and Renee Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., and Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Frey v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Harvey E. Yates Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Boyd Rosene & Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API