Legal Opinion

Oaks At Rivers Edge Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Daniel Island Riverside Developers, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 2, 2017No. Opinion No. 5507PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONDUROS, J.:

**432In this case regarding defective construction, Daniel Island Riverside Developers, LLC (DIRD) and Carriage Hill Associates of Charleston, LLC (CHAC) (collectively, Appellants) contest on appeal the trial court's award of damages to Respondents, arguing the court should have offset the damages with the amount Respondents previously received through settlement. Further, Appellants contend the trial court should have allocated the damages among the various defendants and erred by entering an order prior to Respondents' election of remedies. Finally, Appellants assert the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charleston Development Company, LLC v. AlamiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  2. Palmetto Pointe v. Tri-County RoofingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  3. Palmetto Pointe v. Tri-County RoofingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API