Thomas v. Chattanooga Railway & Light Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Catoosa superior court — Judge Tarver. February 5, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1. Under the facts as pleaded, ho recovery would have been authorized on account of the alleged acts of negligence; and hence the original declaration in attachment was subject to the general demurrer.
2. In addition to the general demurrer there were several special grounds • of. demurrer to the declaration in attachment; upon the presentation of . which counsel for the plaintiff stated “that he would amend to meet the special demurrers.” The court inquired if the amendment was-ready, and counsel answered that it was not, but that he would prepare it; whereupon the court responded by saying,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gibson v. GrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Wall v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Douglass v. Williams Art Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Bryant v. Bank of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lipscomb v. City of CummingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Harris v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Service Loan & Finance Corp. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Medlock v. McAdooCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- London v. Atlanta Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.