Continental Oil Co. v. Allen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The question dispositive of claimant’s motion to dismiss this proceeding by the employer is: May this court treat as reviewable under the pertinent provisions of 85 O.S.Supp.1977 § 3.6 B an appellate panel’s decision which sustains the trial judge’s finding of claimant’s permanent total disability, reduces the applicable rate of weekly benefits due him and vacates the award rested on the wrong rate, but (a) ¡eaves undetermined — and “reserved for future hearing” — the amount of compensation accrued at the decreased rate adjudged to be applicable as well as the counsel fee to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCallum Forber v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Reid v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Armour & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Hughes Motor Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kansas Explorations, Inc. v. BlaineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Brown v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Dean v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Houston v. ZebcoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.