Legal Opinion

Fuentes v. Christina Perez

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1977No. Civ. 39616PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

This case concerns the right of one, who as a proximate result of another’s tortious breach of contract has suffered damages to his property, to recover, in addition to such damages, damages for emotional distress which also proximately resulted from the tortious breach.

Defendants were licensed contractors (hereafter for convenience, “contractor”). The contractor undertook some construction work on top of plaintiffs’ home which necessitated removal of all or a portion of its roof. About 1 p.m., September 25, 1972, while the roof was in that condition, plaintiffs advised…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API