Legal Opinion

Woods v. Bailey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

By a previous order of this court, the plaintiff, as a nonresident of the district, was required to give security for costs in the sum of $250. 111 Fed. 121. Before that *391order was made, on a rule taken upon her to give such security, she endeavored to avail herself of the act of July 20, 1892 (27 Stat. 252), by filing an affidavit of poverty, but it was adjudged insufficient, and the order made. She now comes in with one which is sufficient in form, and the question is whether she is entitled to have it considered. In my opinion, she is. While there is quite a little…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Great Northern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1894
  2. Brinkley v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1899
  3. Reed v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Whittle v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1900
  5. Whelan v. Manhattan Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKelton v. BrunoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Woods v. BaileyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API