Legal Opinion

Betty Holladay v. Otis Bowen, as Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 1988No. 87-7321PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

In this case we must decide whether a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) conflicts impermissibly with his duty to ensure that determinations of an individual’s eligibility for Social Security Income (“SSI”) benefits are based on a fully and fairly developed record. We must also decide whether the Secretary committed reversible error in failing to secure the testimony of a vocational expert in denying SSI benefits on the basis of an applicant’s residual functional capacity. The district court affirmed the Secretary’s decision that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Marie McDaniel v. Otis R. Bowen , Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Henry Green v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Holley v. ChaterDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  4. Sellers v. BarnhartDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
  5. Rease v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API