Legal Opinion
Rease v. Barnhart
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 12, 2006No. 1:04-cv-03239PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINAL ORDER
FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a pro se action to review the determination by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Edward Lorenzo Rease is not entitled to a period of disability, or disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under §§ 216(i) and 223(a), and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423(a), and 1382.
PART ONE HISTORY OF THE CASE
On May 5, 1999 the claimant filed the instant application for a period of disability and DIB and/or SSI. In the combined application for DIB, the claimant alleged…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Renee S. Phillips v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Billy D. Crawford v. Comm. of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022
- Christopher Storch v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Jackson v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
- Pena v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Pritchett v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.