Legal Opinion

Doyen v. Lamb

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1951No. File No. 9175PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This action was brought by M. H. Doyen, as guardian on behalf of his minor son David, to recover for injuries sustained by the son when he came into contact-with an automobile being driven by the defendant. The jury returned-a verdict for the plaintiff. The court granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that plaintiff failed to prove actionable negligence. Plaintiff appeals.

*128The accident occurred shortly after four o’clock in the afternoon of December 18, 1948, when David Doyen, then two months under six years of age, was crossing the main business…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Granflaten v. RohdeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Bottling Co. Of Black Hills v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Finch v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Doyen v. LambSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API