Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting Feitner

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 1, 1918, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate's Court settling the accounts of Thomas L. Feitner as executor of Louisa Varet, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 1, 1918, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate's Court settling the accounts of Thomas L. Feitner as executor of Louisa Varet, deceased. Appellants contended that the decree was erroneous in failing to surcharge the executor with the losses sustained by the estate by reason of his failure to comply with the command of his testatrix and to dispose of certain assets of the estate as directed by the will and as required of him in the exercise of due prudence…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PulitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of KentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of SurplessNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of WinburnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API