Legal Opinion
Rustamova v. Colvin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 22, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-cv-02322-SBPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Ulmaskhon ■ Rustamova (“Plaintiff’) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income under Title II of the Social Security Act. United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) in this case on March 19, 2015. Dkt. 23. Judge Beckerman recommended granting the Commissioner’s motion to remand for further administrative proceedings. Dkt. 20. Plaintiff timely filed objections,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bouvia v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Castillo v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Crystal K. v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- David T. v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.