Realty Investments, Inc. v. HARRIS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
This assumpsit action to recover a real estate commission was heard by a court Avithout a jury. The trial judge found for the plaintiff, his findings Avere sustained by the court en banc, and the defendant took this appeal.
The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff, a duly licensed real estate broker, was employed by the defendant to sell certain real estate owned by it in Pittsburgh for the price of $3,000.00, on which the plaintiff Avas to be paid the usual brokerage commission of 5 percent. On October 14, 1942, the plaintiff secured a purchaser for the property, one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Perletto v. Lancaster Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Advance Realty Co. v. McLeodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zitzelberger v. SalvatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- New Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Rottner v. Mencoff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950