Legal Opinion

Wilson Bros. v. Mobile O. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1922No. 5 Div. 831PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The report of this case upon former appeal will be found in 207 Ala. 171, 92 South. 246.

The question to the witness Turner as to the number of sparks, emitted, and to which an objection was sustained, could have been intended only to show that there was an unusual quantity or that they were of an unusual size, and the witness subsequently testified that the sparks were large and that this train threw out more than other trains; so, if there was error, it was without injury.

There was no error in giving charge 3 at the request of the defendant. It instructed a finding for the defendant only in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. SchimpfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Green v. Southern States Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Wilson Bros. v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CheatwoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. McMillan v. Manistee Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Reed v. L. Hammel Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Roll v. DockerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Allen v. Birmingham Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Brown v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API