State ex rel. Ethell v. Hendricks

I agree with respondent’s contention that relator by his conduct waived his right to object to the method of examination.

It is conceded that there is no justification on this record *228for finding any fraud or bad faith on the part of either the civil service commission or respondent.

The agreed statement of facts reads in part:

“5. That prior to said examination the civil service commission of the city * * * posted on the bulletin board of the police department a notice of examination which stated that 75 per cent of said examination would be written and 25 per cent of the examination would be…