Legal Opinion

Urbain v. Beierling

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 2013No. Docket No. 309049PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition in this action involving a dissolved partnership.1 Because the partnership could be dissolved by the express will of any partner pursuant to the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), MCL 449.1 et seq., plaintiffs breach of fiduciary duty claim fails as a matter of law, plaintiff has failed to present evidence showing that defendants breached their duty to render information, plaintiffs dissolution-of-partnership and accounting claims fail because the partnership had no profits or assets to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kerrigan v. Visalus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  2. Klein v. HP Pelzer Automotive Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Estate of Peterson v. Brannigan Bros Restaurants and Taverns LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Shinn v. Michigan Assigned Claims FacilityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API