Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herrera v. Braunstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 5, 2006Published

1DissentSuarez, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. The issue on this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury award of $100,000 for punitive damages and a reduced compensatory damages award of $100,000. I find that it was and would affirm the amended judgment.

The evidence at the jury trial established that Fausto Herrera, an “elderly gentleman” of approximately 60 years of age and the porter/doorman of a luxury rental on West End Avenue, was subjected to a vicious assault and battery by the defendant, who vituperatively cursed at, menacingly threatened and brutally pushed him from behind into…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Horton v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Pyptiuk v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. O'Donnell v. K-Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Hotaling v. CSX TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API