Legal Opinion

Smith-Wolf Construction, Inc. v. Hood

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1988No. 84CA0841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRISWELL, Judge.

Defendant, A1 Hood, appeals from the district court judgment that awarded plaintiff $52,646 in damages for breach of express and implied warranties relating to a waterproofing product manufactured by defendant. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the general contractor to perform waterproofing services in conjunction with the construction of the second bore of the Eisenhower Tunnel. Prior to preparing its bid that led to this subcontract, plaintiffs agent had several conversations with defendant concerning its waterproofing product,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API