Clinton v. State Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The question is whether the compensation received by plaintiff, a single woman, as clerk and stenographer from four corporations, agencies created by the congress, to wit, The Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Wichita, Production Credit Corporation of Wichita, and the Wichita Bank for Cooperatives, is taxable under the Kansas state income tax law.
Plaintiff’s tax return for the year 1936 shows she received the following compensation;
*409The Federal Land Bank of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Clements v. LjungdahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Capitol Building & Loan Ass'n v. Commission of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Meadowlark Hill, Inc. v. KearnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- State ex rel. Goodell v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.