Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Guy Haynes and E. J. Linke, doing business under the assumed name of L. H. L. Lumber Company, against Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Company, a corporation, to recover a balance alleged due the plaintiffs from the defendant on the purchase price of two carloads of ties sold by the plaintiffs to the defendant. From a judgment of involuntary nonsuit the plaintiffs appeal.

At the times herein referred to the plaintiffs were operating a sawmill in Yamhill county, and the defendant was engaged in buying and selling lumber and forest products for export…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Meyer v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Hurst v. W. J. Lake & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Yoshizumi v. Platt Produce CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doherty v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Barmeier v. Oregon Physicians' ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. George v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 8R, UMATILLA CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API