Legal Opinion
Parmely v. Hilderbrand
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1999No. 20892PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Lonny and Jeanny Parmely (Parmely) appeal an Order granting Tom and Glenda Hildebrand’s (Hildebrand) motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand Issues 1 and 2, but affirm Issue 3.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Hildebrand constructed a house north of Sturgis for his family in 1988. Parmely, buyer, purchased the home from Hildebrand, the seller, in 1994. While he had never built a home before; Hildebrand has now been involved in residential construction for twenty years as a concrete/masonry contractor in western South Dakota. He agrees that he had a duty to construct the home in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Trammell v. Prairie States Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Campion v. Parkview ApartmentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Wildeboer v. South Dakota Junior Chamber of Commerce, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Manuel v. WilkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Nickerson v. American States InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Parmely v. HildebrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Corner Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.