Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul A. Caghan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 2019No. 18-2191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) charged an attorney who appeared pro hac vice in Iowa proceedings with violating Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct 32:3.1 (prohibiting lawyer from bringing a frivolous proceeding or controverting a frivolous issue), 32:3.3(a)(1) (prohibiting lawyer from knowingly making or failing to correct false statements of material fact or law to a tribunal), and 32:8.4(d) (prohibiting lawyer from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).

The charges arise out of Iowa litigation in which an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey K. McGinnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Discipline of VoleskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Discipline of VoleskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Curt N. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2023
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. R. Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. R. Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API