Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zacher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1997No. 03814PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following appellant’s conviction on the charge of direct criminal contempt. 1 Appellant’s sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

The relevant facts of this case are not in dispute and they are as follows: Appellant was the court-appointed attorney for criminal defendant Dana Dickerson. Following a pre-trial conference attended by appellant, Dickérson’s case was listed for trial to commence on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Fenstamaker v. FenstamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KolanskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. PruittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In re York County District Attorney's OfficeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Starr v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API