Legal Opinion

McCanless v. . Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1876Published

1Opinion of the Court

The following is, substantially, the statement of the case sent up as a part of the record, upon appeal to this court:

The plaintiff claimed the locus in quo as a purchaser at an execution sale, the execution having been issued in his own behalf.

The defendant claimed the same under a deed from one Richard Cox, the defendant in said execution, dated prior to the sheriff's deed to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff alleged, that the locus in quo was conveyed to the defendant by the said Cox in fraud of his creditors. In support of this allegation, evidence was adduced tending to show that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. In Re Will of BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Peacock v. . StottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Pepper v. . BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API