State v. Handson
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
689 A.2d 1081 (1996)
STATE of Vermont
v.
Carl HANDSON.
No. 94-634.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
December 13, 1996.
Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, Montpelier, and Donal F. Hartman, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Waterbury, for plaintiff-appellee.
Robert Appel, Defender General, Montpelier, for defendant-appellant.
Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.
JOHNSON, Justice.
With this decision we resolve the third case in a recent trilogy of appeals by the Office of the Defender General, all seeking relief from trial court orders to pay for certain services. See State v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hough v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SaariSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. WoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.