Legal Opinion

State v. Handson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 13, 1996No. 94-634Published

1Opinion of the Court

689 A.2d 1081 (1996)

STATE of Vermont

v.

Carl HANDSON.

No. 94-634.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 13, 1996.

Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, Montpelier, and Donal F. Hartman, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Waterbury, for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Appel, Defender General, Montpelier, for defendant-appellant.

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.

JOHNSON, Justice.

With this decision we resolve the third case in a recent trilogy of appeals by the Office of the Defender General, all seeking relief from trial court orders to pay for certain services. See State v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hough v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SaariSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. State v. WoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API