Legal Opinion
Cazort v. Road Improvement District No. 3.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Road Improvement District No. 3 of Johnson County instituted suit in the circuit court of that county by filing a complaint which contained the following allegations:
“Road Improvement District No. 3 of Johnson County is a road district organized and existing under the general laws of the State of Arkansas, and its purpose and object is to improve and build a road from the town of Lamar, through Lutherville and to the line between Johnson and Pope counties. Said road runs over and through a small tract of land owned by the defendant, G-. T. Cazort, and said defendant refuses to agree upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parkview Land Co. v. Road Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Road District No. 6 v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Brumley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Fulton Ferry & Bridge Co. v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. ReddittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Bell v. ConnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- McLeod, Comm. of Revenues v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944