State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
As the two cases depend upon the same state of facts, they have been consolidated, the question in both cases being the validity of a sale of a sixteenth section school in Hempstead 'County, Arkansas. The sale was ordered and made pursuant to authority contained in §§ 2, 3, 4 and *5 of act No. 344 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1919, the provisions of which that are material to issues involved are as follows:
“Section 2. It shall be lawful for the county court of any county in which any permanent school lands and lots, as defined in the preceding section, are situated to order the same…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morris v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Crittenden Lumber Co. v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Gregory v. BartlettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Champion v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Van Etten v. DaughertySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Strawn v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Hobbs v. LenonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Union Investment Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.